HTTP Redirects Explained: 301 vs 302 and SEO Impact
HTTP redirects are server instructions that automatically send users and search engines from one URL to another. Understanding different redirect types—particularly 301 (permanent) versus 302 (temporary)—is crucial for SEO, as incorrect redirects can lose link equity, confuse search engines, and hurt rankings. This guide explains how redirects work, when to use each type, common mistakes, and best practices for implementing redirects that preserve SEO value.
What Are HTTP Redirects?
An HTTP redirect is a server response that tells browsers and search engines that a resource has moved to a different URL. When someone requests the old URL, the server returns a redirect status code (like 301 or 302) along with the new location, and the browser automatically loads the new URL instead.
Redirects are invisible to most users—they simply see the final destination page. However, redirects are critically important for SEO because they determine whether search engines transfer ranking signals (link equity, authority) from the old URL to the new one, and which URL appears in search results.
Common uses for redirects include permanently moving pages to new URLs, restructuring websites while preserving old URLs, consolidating duplicate content to canonical URLs, redirecting old domains to new domains, handling non-www to www (or vice versa), and enforcing HTTPS by redirecting HTTP traffic.
The main redirect types differ in permanence, how search engines treat them, and whether they pass link equity. Choosing the wrong redirect type is a common and costly SEO mistake that can significantly impact your search visibility.
301 Redirect (Permanent Redirect)
A 301 redirect indicates that a page has permanently moved to a new location. This tells search engines to transfer all ranking signals from the old URL to the new URL, remove the old URL from their index, and replace it with the new URL in search results.
When to use 301 redirects: Moving pages permanently to new URLs, migrating an entire site to a new domain, consolidating duplicate content to one canonical URL, changing URL structure permanently (like moving from /category/post/ to /post/), redirecting HTTP to HTTPS permanently, or handling www vs non-www canonicalization.
SEO impact: 301 redirects pass nearly 100% of link equity to the new URL. Google has stated that 301s pass the same amount of PageRank as direct links. The old URL eventually drops from the index and the new URL inherits its rankings. This process can take weeks or months as search engines re-crawl and re-evaluate.
Browser behavior: Browsers typically cache 301 redirects aggressively. If you later decide the redirect was a mistake, users may still be redirected due to browser caching. This makes 301s difficult to reverse without clearing caches or using different redirect types.
Best practice: Use 301 redirects as your default choice whenever permanently moving content. They're the SEO-friendly option for permanent URL changes and should be the vast majority of redirects on most sites.
302 Redirect (Temporary Redirect)
A 302 redirect indicates that a page has temporarily moved. This tells search engines to keep the original URL in their index because the change is temporary. Historically, 302s didn't pass link equity, but modern search engines (including Google) now treat them more like 301s if they remain in place for extended periods.
When to use 302 redirects: A/B testing different pages (redirecting some users to test versions), temporarily redirecting during maintenance or updates, seasonal redirects (like redirecting product pages during out-of-stock periods), testing page consolidation before making it permanent, or any situation where the redirect truly is temporary and you'll restore the original URL.
SEO impact: 302 redirects were historically problematic for SEO because they didn't pass link equity. Google now treats long-standing 302s more like 301s, eventually transferring rankings. However, this creates ambiguity and delay—it's unclear when Google decides a 302 is "permanent enough" to transfer signals.
Common mistake: Using 302 redirects when you actually mean the change to be permanent. This is one of the most common redirect errors and can significantly hurt SEO by preventing timely transfer of link equity. If a move is permanent, always use 301, not 302.
Browser behavior: Browsers typically don't cache 302 redirects as aggressively as 301s, making them easier to reverse or remove without cache issues.
Other Redirect Types (307, 308)
307 Temporary Redirect: This is similar to 302 but with a key difference—307 guarantees that the request method (GET, POST, etc.) remains unchanged during the redirect. For most SEO purposes, 302 and 307 are functionally equivalent. Use 307 when you need to preserve POST data in forms or API requests during temporary redirects.
308 Permanent Redirect: This is the HTTP/1.1 equivalent of 301 with method preservation. Like 307, it ensures the request method doesn't change. For SEO purposes, 308 and 301 are largely equivalent. Use 308 when you need strict method preservation in permanent redirects, though 301 remains more universally supported.
Meta Refresh Redirects: These use HTML meta tags or JavaScript to redirect after a delay. They're not true HTTP redirects and are generally discouraged for SEO. They don't pass link equity as effectively as server-side redirects and can create poor user experiences. Avoid them when possible; use server-side redirects instead.
JavaScript Redirects: Client-side redirects using JavaScript (window.location). These work for users but may not be processed by search engine crawlers, potentially causing indexing issues. Use server-side redirects whenever possible for SEO-critical redirects.
Common Redirect Mistakes
Using 302 instead of 301 for permanent moves: This is the most common and damaging redirect mistake. If a page permanently moves, use 301. Using 302 delays or prevents transfer of link equity and can result in the wrong URL appearing in search results.
Redirect chains: This happens when URL A redirects to URL B, which redirects to URL C. Each redirect adds latency, worsens user experience, and can dilute link equity. Search engines may stop following after 3-5 hops. Always redirect directly to the final destination.
Redirect loops: This occurs when URL A redirects to URL B, which redirects back to URL A. This creates an infinite loop, breaks the page completely, and prevents both users and search engines from accessing content. Common causes include misconfigured redirect rules or conflicts between redirect rules.
Redirecting to irrelevant pages: When a page is deleted, redirecting it to the homepage or an unrelated page is poor practice. Users and search engines expect relevant alternatives. Redirect to the most relevant remaining page, or return 404/410 if no suitable alternative exists.
Not redirecting old URLs after site migration: Failing to implement redirects during site restructuring or domain changes causes broken links, lost link equity, and traffic drops. Always create comprehensive redirect maps before major URL changes.
Leaving redirects in place too long: While redirects should remain indefinitely for permanent moves, extremely old redirects (5+ years) can sometimes be removed if the old URLs have no remaining traffic or links. However, err on the side of keeping redirects longer rather than removing them prematurely.
How Redirects Affect SEO
Link equity transfer: Proper 301 redirects transfer nearly all ranking signals from old URLs to new URLs. This includes backlinks, domain authority, PageRank, and other ranking factors. Incorrect or missing redirects lose this value permanently.
Indexing and rankings: When you properly redirect a URL, search engines eventually remove the old URL from their index and replace it with the new URL, transferring rankings. This process takes time—sometimes weeks or months—as search engines re-crawl and re-evaluate.
User experience: Redirects should be invisible and fast. Redirect chains increase load time and worsen user experience. Each redirect adds 100-300ms latency. For mobile users on slow connections, this compounds. Keep redirect paths short.
Crawl budget: Every redirect consumes crawl budget—the number of pages search engines will crawl on your site. Excessive redirects, especially chains, waste crawl budget. This is particularly important for large sites where crawl budget is limited.
Domain migrations: When migrating to a new domain, 301 redirects from old domain to new domain are essential. Without them, you effectively start from scratch, losing years of SEO value. Even with perfect redirects, expect some temporary ranking drops during the migration period.
When to Use Different Redirect Types
Use 301 redirects for: Permanent page moves, site restructuring, domain changes, HTTPS migration, www vs non-www canonicalization, consolidating duplicate content, and any situation where the old URL should never be used again.
Use 302 redirects for: A/B testing (redirecting some users to test versions), temporary maintenance pages, seasonal redirects that will be reversed, testing page consolidation before committing, and genuinely temporary URL changes where you'll restore the original URL.
Use 404/410 instead of redirects when: No suitable replacement page exists, the content is genuinely deleted with no relevant alternative, redirecting would confuse users (redirecting to unrelated content), or you're trying to remove low-quality pages from the index.
Avoid client-side redirects (meta refresh, JavaScript) for: SEO-critical redirects, permanent page moves, or situations where search engine compatibility is important. Use server-side redirects instead.
How Redirect Checking Tools Help
Redirect checker tools identify redirect chains by tracing the full path from source URL to final destination, detect redirect loops that break pages, verify redirect types (301 vs 302), measure redirect speed and latency, and identify mixed-content issues in HTTPS redirects.
These tools are essential before and after site migrations to verify all redirects work correctly, identify redirect chains that need fixing, confirm 301s (not 302s) are used for permanent moves, and check that old URLs redirect to appropriate destinations.
Google Search Console provides redirect data in coverage reports, showing URLs with redirect issues, redirect chains, and redirect errors. Monitoring these reports helps identify problems before they significantly impact SEO.
Server log analysis reveals how search engines interact with your redirects—whether they're following them, how long they take, and if there are patterns of redirect issues affecting crawling efficiency.
Troubleshooting Redirect Issues
Rankings dropped after redirects: Temporary ranking drops are normal after redirecting. Give it 2-4 weeks for search engines to fully process. If rankings don't recover, check: redirects are 301 (not 302), no redirect chains exist, destination pages are high quality, and URLs are indexed in Search Console.
Redirect chains identified: Update redirect rules to point directly to final destinations. Don't add another redirect on top—fix the existing ones to eliminate intermediate hops. Update internal links to point directly to new URLs, reducing reliance on redirects.
Redirect loop detected: Identify conflicting redirect rules in .htaccess, server config, plugins, or CDN settings. Common cause is redirect rules that contradict each other. Disable redirects one by one to identify the conflict, then fix or remove conflicting rules.
Wrong URL appearing in search results: If the old URL still appears instead of the new one, verify you're using 301 (not 302), the new URL is properly indexable (not blocked by robots.txt or noindex), and sufficient time has passed (can take weeks for search engines to swap URLs).
Redirects too slow: Each redirect adds latency. If pages are slow after redirecting, eliminate redirect chains, consider serving final content directly instead of redirecting when possible, optimize server response times, and use a CDN to reduce latency for global users.
Best Practices for Redirects
Always use 301 for permanent changes: If a page permanently moves, use 301. Don't use 302 "to be safe"—this is actually less safe for SEO. Only use 302 for genuinely temporary redirects.
Redirect to relevant pages: When deleting content, redirect to the most relevant remaining page. If no relevant alternative exists, return 404/410 rather than redirecting to your homepage or an unrelated page.
Eliminate redirect chains: Always redirect directly to the final destination. After adding new redirects, audit existing ones to ensure you haven't created chains. Update old redirects to point to current final destinations.
Keep redirect mappings documented: Maintain a spreadsheet or database of all redirects—old URL, new URL, redirect type, date implemented, and reason. This helps prevent redirect chains and makes future site changes easier.
Update internal links: After redirecting, update internal links to point directly to new URLs. This reduces server load, improves page speed, and ensures link equity flows directly without passing through redirects.
Test redirects before going live: Before major URL changes or migrations, test redirects in staging environments. Verify all old URLs redirect correctly, no chains or loops exist, redirect types are correct (301 vs 302), and pages load quickly.
Monitor after implementing: Use Google Search Console to monitor coverage issues, check for unexpected redirect errors, verify old URLs are being deindexed, and confirm new URLs are being indexed. Track rankings and traffic to catch problems early.
Keep redirects indefinitely for important pages: Don't remove redirects after a few months. High-value pages with significant backlinks should redirect indefinitely. Only consider removing redirects for low-value pages after years with no traffic or links.
Summary
HTTP redirects are essential for managing URL changes while preserving SEO value. The most important distinction is 301 (permanent) versus 302 (temporary)—using the wrong type is a common and costly mistake. 301 redirects transfer link equity and should be used for all permanent URL changes.
Common redirect mistakes include using 302 when 301 is appropriate, creating redirect chains, redirecting to irrelevant pages, and failing to implement redirects during site migrations. These errors can significantly hurt SEO by losing link equity or confusing search engines.
Best practices include always using 301 for permanent changes, redirecting to relevant pages, eliminating redirect chains, updating internal links after redirecting, keeping redirects documented, and monitoring redirects in Google Search Console. Proper redirect implementation preserves hard-earned SEO value during site changes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the difference between 301 and 302 redirects?
301 is a permanent redirect that transfers link equity to the new URL and tells search engines to replace the old URL with the new one in search results. 302 is a temporary redirect that historically didn't transfer link equity (though Google now treats long-standing 302s more like 301s). Always use 301 for permanent URL changes.
Do redirects hurt SEO?
Proper 301 redirects don't hurt SEO—they preserve nearly 100% of link equity. However, redirect chains, incorrect redirect types (302 instead of 301), redirects to irrelevant pages, or missing redirects can significantly hurt SEO by losing link equity or confusing search engines.
How long should I keep redirects in place?
For important pages with backlinks or traffic, keep redirects indefinitely. Even after years, external sites may still link to old URLs. Only consider removing redirects for low-value pages after several years with no traffic or links. It's better to keep redirects longer than necessary than to remove them too early.
What's a redirect chain and why is it bad?
A redirect chain occurs when URL A redirects to URL B, which redirects to URL C. Chains slow down page loading (each redirect adds latency), waste crawl budget, may dilute link equity, and can cause search engines to stop following after 3-5 hops. Always redirect directly to the final destination.
Should I redirect deleted pages to the homepage?
No, unless the homepage is genuinely the most relevant alternative. Redirect deleted pages to the most relevant remaining content. If no relevant page exists, return 404/410 instead of redirecting to the homepage. Redirecting everything to the homepage creates poor user experience and may look manipulative to search engines.